Thursday, February 3, 2011

All organized religions have unequivocally claimed man for the life in the truth; thus it is sheer folly to fight in the name of religion and god.



People are making unlimited sacrifices and enduring unlimited suffering in the name of protecting their religion and god. They are therefore ignorant about the truth and incapable of understanding the ultimate truth, which is universal god. All organized religions have unequivocally claimed man for the life in the truth; thus it is sheer folly to fight in the name of religion and god.

It is time that humanity had a fresh vision of truth that the mind, which is in the form of universe, is myth and consciousness is the only thing that is real and that matters.  On the base of consciousness as self, the physical life is a vain and empty pursuit of illusory values.

Those who say we can I Am Brahman, or I Am one with Brahman, or approach Brahman, or realize Brahman-- these declarations are dualistic errors. First of all the” I Am” is not the self but the formless knower of the “I am” is the true self.   The true self is the one which is without the body and without the mind (universe).

One must make an effort to know the ultimate truth. Consciousness is there always. One has got it, there is nothing new to be acquired, only he has the receptive and sharpness to grasp and understand and assimilate it, when one becomes aware about it. But there is a difference between understanding and realization.

Mental effort is required for this understanding only, whereas once understood no special effort is needed to remember it.  Until then he only have an idea of consciousness, he only partially understand it. But once he  thoroughly grasp what it is and that all these things are consciousness , he  will then constantly find it present everywhere and in everything  in all the three states without further effort, because he  will perceive the ultimate truth  by understanding, even in the midst of worldly existence.

When there is only one thing (consciousness) known, then there is nothing to change, nothing to appear or disappear; when one speak of remembering or forgetting consciousness that implies he believes in the existence of something else, i.e. a second thing, which is to be remembered. That would show he have not known that all is one. But knowing it, there is no second, consequently no intermittent perception of consciousness, but a permanent effortless understanding that it alone is.