Monday, November 21, 2011

Just because we can't see the soul it doesn’t mean it doesn't exist, although this is a common way in which people deny the existence of the soul, which is in the form of consciousness.


Just because we can't see the soul it doesn’t mean it doesn't exist, although this is a common way in which people deny the existence of the soul, which is in the form of consciousness. 

People think the soul does not exist because their master say so or some teaching say so or some scriptures say so.  First they must know the fact that, the soul is not individual but it is universal it pervades the whole universe as its formless substance.  


However, one can attest to the fact that, it does exist, because the whole physical existence is dependent on it. Even though one can't see it but he cannot exist without it. Without it nothing can exists and nothing can be known or seen or experienced.  Until one thinks his body or ego as self, he will remain ignorant of the soul, which is in the form of consciousness.  Thus he is remains unaware of the consciousness because he is in duality. He identifies the self with the physical body and becomes ignorant of the soul and experiences the duality as reality.  


Man remains as the part of the objective world and tries to discover the ultimate truth not realizing the fact that, he and his experience of the universe is an object to the formless subject. He applies it to things seen as an individual. This is because he is ignorant of the relation between the formless subject [soul] and the object [mind or universe].  He judges everything on the base of the object as subject and trying to know and realize the ultimate truth on the base of objectified subject.   Whatever objects are known by the ego, are objects within the object(universe). 


Thoughts are also objects because it is the part of the objective universe. The thoughts will not rise without the form, which is an object. Whether the objects are there or not, consciousness will always be there, even in deep sleep.

Psychologists say that if the object is not there to draw ones attention, then there is no consciousness. The latter, therefore insist on consciousness being a relation between one who is aware and an object of which he is aware. It is obvious that we differ in the meaning of the term consciousness.

 Ultimate truth means the knowledge of the non-relation, and relation whereas psychology as well as in religious or pseudo-Vedanta Consciousness is only Witnessing.

Psychologists have analyzed much as far as subject-object relation i.e. mind plus object equals consciousness and then stopped. But they have to analyze still further in the direction of noting that all objects are constantly changing, illusion, which implies that there is a constant standard of reference, something that notes the changes because it keeps unchanged itself. That something is Consciousness.

The idea of change presupposes existence of something unchanging, how does one distinguish this change from changelessness? By what means do one has to know that change has occurred? There is, there must be a changeless knower of the ever-changing; whilst all changes the consciousness remains unchanged.

Thoughts are arising within the mirage and pass away every moment. Every object is an idea within the mirage. Hence every object has no more value than that of a thought because both are part of the mirage. 


The moment is time. The time creates division in consciousness, which is the true self.  The past, present and future exists within the myth and so also this and that.