Gaudapada’s rational exposition of
Advaita: - that
whatever is seen, whether external or internal, whether by the ordinary persons
or yogis, is unreal.
DVI" means two. DVI"
connotes dual existence and the non-dual. Which of these two is non-existence?
People think that there is God and that the jivas--souls-- like them
form the second, other than them. There is no such duality at all.
"Soul”, which is
present in the form of consciousness,
is the only reality and there is nothing other than this soul or
consciousness, which is the innermost self. On the stand point the formless
soul or consciousness, innermost self, there is no second thing exists other
than consciousness. Because the whole
universe in, which we all exist is created out of consciousness. There is no second thing exist other than
consciousness. Hence it is non-dual (non-duality)
Why distinction should imply contradiction. What does the distinction mean? It implies that two things are not the same, hence duality exists there.
The
illusion never reaches the self, which is consciousness. The false self never
knows it. He who says he has a vision of the highest or describes it as super
consciousness etc. does not understand consciousness, because it is free from
all imaginations, because it exists
prior to all experience and imagination.
Ordinarily
knowledge arises from experience of object by a subject; that all knowledge of
objects will only lead to more thinking but never gives one the ultimate
reality.
Most
thinkers think that by trying and getting more and still more
objective experience and then when they have enough they may get reality. But
they can never get at the ultimate truth that way because it leads to endless
thoughts and because it ignores the formless witness, one must make the inquiry
into the formless witness to find reality. One need not
give up its investigations into objects; they are useful empirically; but only
that one should not delude him-self that it is the correct path to final
Reality.
No one has ever seen
the awakening of consciousness, because consciousness is prior to anything that
exists. No one has seen god creating the
universe with all its contents, because he did not exist prior to Gods
creation. Such talks are mere speculated hypothesis.
Yogi
thinks of his body that is chakras. He imagines there are chakras within his
body, when he sits down to meditate, he is thinking his body; next he is trying
to get rid of thoughts i.e. he is already thinking of those thoughts. Thus he
never becomes aware of the witness because he is only aware of the witnessed.
Thus, any physical practice becomes bondage. The
ultimate truth lies beyond the body and experience of the world.
One
can get only a thought with thinking. Meditation is only an effort to divert
the attention; it is mere imagination. Remaining with or without the thoughts
is not wisdom. When one’s attention is
riveted to an object within the waking or dream, he is unaware of the subject,
which is consciousness. Waking or a dream are mere an object to the subject,
which is consciousness.
When one is absorbed in thinking of
anything, he forgets the subject is consciousness, the self, that which sees
all the three states. One may think for many years but it is all thoughts
arises within the waking experience, hence not the consciousness because the waking
experience is a mere mirage created out of consciousness. But when one knows
the formless substance and witness of the three states, he does get consciousness,
the true self, the knower, the seer of the coming and going of the three states.
The consciousness without the illusion is the eternal.