Thursday, July 14, 2011

Adyatmic discussion- 21

I do not agree with the fact that the mere existence. Existence is temporary, always connected with time and space, while the truth is unchanging and everlasting. (Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)
June 2 at 1:09am · · ·


  • 4 people like this.

    • Christy Pfeifer sooo true ♥
      June 2 at 1:50am · · 1 person

    • Shantinath Neuen really?... when, like Buddha stated: "all form is emptiness... and all that is emptiness is form" has a meaning, then the "truth", albyte its nondual lable is changing continuously...
      June 8 at 10:41am ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou ‎????really really???? when you say: all is relative, or all is changing then this "truth" that all is relative, is this relative or is it true? So you have to use your "truth" to the "truth" itself. To say all is changin continously must be an everlasting truth, because if not, than the message, all is changing is not true, and somethin absolute and unchangable remains. And vice versa, logically
      June 8 at 3:02pm ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou so please dear hobby-buddhists, check out your buddhism deeply ;o)
      June 8 at 3:03pm ·

    • Shantinath Neuen Pavlos... why do you put so much anger in your comment? maybe i can explain what i am saying... you assume that Buddha`s statement is saying that everything is relative... but this is not at all what it says... it says that there is no difference between the consciousness which is empty or the consciousness that is form....
      June 8 at 3:36pm ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou hello Shantinath, my english is not so good, so i understood it in the way, that you understood it, in the way that "there can not be "a truth" and that the message form is emptyness and vice versa would be more adequat. The ironical Pepper is more for my self-amousement ;o)
      June 9 at 1:25am ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou Raphael (a advaita-teacher) said something like, the teachings of buddha would analyze the empirical world and would mostly just inplicate the "metaphysical" Truth. So maybe there is no bridge between the relative and the absolute. Buddha said once, that if there would not be, a uncaused, absolute truth, all his teachings would make no sense.
      June 9 at 1:28am ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou and, never mind, i mostly react to my personal misinterpretations ;-)
      June 9 at 1:30am ·

    • Shanti Ananda
      my english also not good. therefore occasionally used compiler. as well as now. in the quotation Nisargadatta talk about our individual existence, which is bound to space and time. but this individual consciousness, our existence is a fact ...See More

      June 9 at 1:35am · · 1 person

    • Christy Pfeifer Misunderstanding " happens". We cannot define the Absolute and unchanging Truth. In the phenomenal realm all is relative..is changing and all has its place. But in this there is no separation, like the two parts of one coin. Are you happy , now????? Hi, Pavlos ♥
      June 9 at 1:37am · · 1 person

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      Existence is both dual and non-dual existence. The duality is illusory existence and non-duality is permanent and eternal existence. When one takes world is both real and unreal he is bound to have all confusion. The individual experience of the birth, life, death and the world are mere mirage created out of consciousness.
      The individual experience is real because it is a manifestation of consciousness and impermanent, but it is unreal, in the sense, that it is not absolute and eternal like consciousness itself.
      When our approach is more practical, and we stuck with the reality of practical life within the practical world, we take it as real, but deeper self-search revel the fact that, the self is not individual because it pervades in everything and everywhere in the universe, which appears as waking or dream. Thus the self is neither the waking entity nor the dream entity but self is the formless substance and witness of the three states. That formless substance and witness is consciousness. Thus consciousness alone is real and eternal and the universe, which is in the form of mind, appears as waking or dream [duality] and diapers as [non-duality]

      July 5 at 10:05pm · · 1 person

    • Ernest Ji Yes!
      July 5 at 10:47pm ·

    • Shantinath Neuen consciousness cannot be the witness... ponder!
      July 5 at 11:01pm ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      The witness and witnessed are one in essence. There is no second thing exist other than consciousness. Consciousness can remains with or without the universe[waking or dream] as it remains in deep sleep. When it becomes consciously aware of...See More

      July 6 at 8:01am · · 1 person

    • Shantinath Neuen this is an ant describing the life of a mermaid....
      July 6 at 10:27am ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar When the ant is not aware of the fact that, it is not an ant and mermaid is not mermaid in reality, it experiences its form and name as reality and remain speculating things as an ant. When the ignorance vanishes than there is neither the ant nor the mermaid but the formless knower of the form and name, which is consciousness alone exists as ultimate truth or Brahman.
      July 6 at 10:52am ·

    • Shantinath Neuen right... now you are talking... the only thing is... consciousness is NOT witnessing itself...
      July 6 at 11:23am ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      Within the duality[ignorance or illusion ] the consciousness seems to be many but in reality the consciousness is one. Since I and you and the world are part of the illusion created out of conciousness. And we are discussing within the i...See More

      July 6 at 1:01pm ·

    • Shantinath Neuen ‎...you see... nothing to witness... nobody witnessing...
      July 6 at 1:21pm · · 1 person

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      From ultimate standpoint there is noting to witness because the witness and witnessed are one in essence. That essence is consciousness. Without realizing consciousness as true self and saying there is no witness nobody on the base of physical self or false self, is mere intellectuality. Without consciousness no one can say there is nothing to witness and there is nobody because the consciousness is the very basis of one who says there nothing to witness and there is nobody. no one and his experience of the universe can exist without the consciousness. The consciousness is prior to anything that exist. And it is cause of the universe that appears as waking or dream[duality] and disappears as deep sleep[non-duality] and it itself is uncaused. Thus realization of ultimate truth or Brahman is necessary to know what is what.

      July 6 at 1:59pm ·

    • Shantinath Neuen hahaha... "Thus, realization of ultimate truth..." what a delicious, utterly nonsense sentence...
      July 6 at 4:50pm ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      I respect your views but as per my conviction derived fro deeper self-search:- All sentences, words, thoughts and also the person who thinks everything is nonsense is created out of consciousness,which he is unaware of , because he thinks his body as body, his ego as ego his experience of the ,world as world but never he is unaware of the truth they are just mirage created out consciousness due to ignorance of the truth . People fail to understand that , the emptiness is the nature of the self ,which is consciousness. When self becomes aware of its formless non-dual nature it becomes empty of ignorance or illusion or duality or experience of waking or dream. thus whatever remains empty of duality or ignorance or illusion is non-dual reality. only through wisdom one becomes aware of the truth in he midst of duality. that is why "Sri,Sankara said:- Without causing the objective universe to vanish and without knowing the truth of the Self, how is one to achieve Liberation. [63- VivekaChudamani ] "
      Universe will not remain as reality when wisdom dawns. Universe is mere mirage created out of consciousness and there is unity in diversity because there is no second thing exist other than consciousness.
      One thinks he is imprisoned within this body; whereas the body and his experience of the world are within the mind. The consciousness is hidden within the three states but it is without the three states. The one, which has the awareness of the three states, is not the body but the soul, which is in the form of consciousness. Thus consciousness is not limited to waking experience alone because it pervades all the three states. until one views and judges the world-view on base of ego he is in the grip of individuality or intellectuality. The self is not an individual because it is universal. And it pervades in everything and everywhere in all the three states. Thus individualized judgment will not lead one non-dual destination. that is why Sri,Sankara says in Viveka Chudamani :-65. As a treasure hidden underground requires (for its extraction) competent instruction, excavation, the removal of stones and other such things lying above it and (finally) grasping, but never comes out by being (merely) called out by name, so the transparent Truth of the self, which is hidden by Maya and its effects, is to be attained through the instructions of a knower of Brahman, followed by reflection, meditation and so forth, but not through perverted arguments.
      66. Therefore the wise should, as in the case of disease and the like, personally strive by all the means in their power to be free from the bondage of repeated births and deaths.
      thus one has to know what is real by realizing our body and our experience of the world is mere illusion created out of consciousness,which the inner most self. The nature of the self is emptiness. and it is identified by different masters with different name, such as Brahman,Buddha's nature ,Christ consciousness,Self ,Ultimate Truth. Even in the Buddhism: - Buddhist teaching has itself become a kind of interactive and self-evolving process, much like its idea of pratityasamutpada. However, the end goal is still Nirvana, which is an experience ultimately beyond all concepts and language, even beyond the Buddhist teachings. In the end even the attachment to the Dharma, the Buddhist teaching, must be dropped like all other attachments. The tradition compares the teaching to a raft upon which one crosses a swift river to get to the other side; once one is on the far shore; there is no longer any need to carry the raft. The far shore is Nirvana, and it is also said that when one arrives, one can see quite clearly that there was never any river at all.
      The scriptures and theories and teaching based on the ego are not the yardstick. Using them as yardstick to understand and assimilate the truth will lead one towards pursuit of arguments. Seeker of truth has to discover on his own, the truth of his true existence by inquiring “what is mind?” and “what is substance of the mind?” and move forward.
      The wisdom consists in knowing the truth, that everything [mind or physical existence] is consciousness. Freedom [truth] is always there yet one does not know it. But to those whose reason is turned away from physicality and who have attained the serenity of the soul/self [consciousness] are quite near to the Ultimate Truth.

      July 6 at 5:56pm ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar If the subject is object and object is subject, then there is no second thing other than the subject . Thus the subject is consciousness consciousness alone is real and eternal.
      July 6 at 7:46pm ·

    • Shantinath Neuen AHA... Iamyou...
      July 6 at 8:23pm ·

    • Christy Pfeifer ‎...and You are me.....heheheh :-)
      July 7 at 1:34am ·

    • Dilip Desai put another way, both you & me are fiction !!!!!!!!
      July 9 at 5:31pm ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      Self is not limited to mere 'I' and YOU, because the self is not an individual. It is not individual because it is formless. Self,which is in the form of consciousness pervades in everything and everywhere in the universe. Until one holds '...See More

      July 9 at 6:14pm ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      Dear Iamyou, Deeper self-search revels the fact that 'I AM' or 'I' is an object to the formless subject. Self is not ‘I’ or I AM. Until 'I' or 'I AM' is considered as self, the separation is bound to be there. Until separation is there duality bound to be there. Until duality is there the ignorance bound to be there. Until ignorance is there the illusion bound to be there. Until illusion is there unreality prevails as reality. Until unreality prevails as reality the experience of birth, life, death and the world prevails as reality. Until the experience of birth, life, death as reality, self is in the grip of duality, separation, ignorance, illusion. If one is seriously seeking truth than it is high time to drop holding 'I' or 'I' AM' as self, because the self is beyond 'I' or 'I AM'.

      That is why Buddha said: - Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true.

      The words have meaning in duality. Duality exists until mind exists. Mind exists where there is division of form, time and space. If there is no division of form, time and space, than there is no mind. Words are used as a tool to name individual objects and feelings within the duality. The words become meaningless when one becomes aware of the formless substance of the mind, which is consciousness. Consciousness is our inner most self. From the standpoint of our inner most self, the mind is mere mirage. If mind is mere mirage then the form, time and space are mere mirage. If form, time and space are mere mirage than the thoughts and words which rises within the scope of form, time and space are also part and parcel of that mirage. Thus body, ego, words, thoughts, and whatever the contents of the universe are within the mirage created out of single stuff that is consciousness. Thus it is necessary to know 'What is mind?' and 'What is the substance of the mind?' and 'What is the source of the mind?', in order to realize the words are meaningless in the realm of truth.

      But deeper self-search reveals the fact that 'I' is not the self because it appears and disappears. The formless substance and witness of the 'I' ,which is formless consciousness is the true self. If the self is form [I] than the evolution theory holds water. If the self is formless [soul] than all the theories based on the form is of no value. Until one thinks 'I' or I AM' as self all these theories cannot transport anyone beyond form, time and space. the theory of evolution is based on individuality ,whereas the self, pervades in everything and everywhere in the universe. Individuality is reality within the falsehood. Thus all the theory based on individuality is bound to be falsehood. Thus our judgment and reason and conclusion has to be based on formless self not on the form[I] as self to realize Illusion is where one is bound to:

      Form, time and space

      Birth, life and death

      Pain and Pleasure,

      Burden and bondage

      Waking, dream and deep sleep

      Universe/Mind /Duality

      Illusion is created out of consciousness. Because of ignorance the illusion is experienced as reality. Illusory reality deludes because I is based on egocentricity. In egocentricity one does knows not the ultimate truth and permanently remains in ignorance.

      Thus it is high time to drop all accumulated dross and move forward with deeper verification and accept only un-contradictable truth, because un-contradictable truth is non-dual truth.
      In self-awareness Change and changeless are one in essence than only there is self-awareness. The knower and known and the knowledge are also consciousness. When the self which is consciousness becomes aware of its own formless true nature in the midst of diversity or duality it is called self –awareness.

      Man and the world is product of ignorance. Thus it is not the man who is in ignorance but it is the formless consciousness [true self] , which is in ignorance of its true nature. When self becomes aware of its true nature than its ignorance vanishes and it alone prevails in its own awareness. Thus body, senses, intellect, ego, universe are mere mirage created out of consciousness.

      Tuesday at 8:22am ·

    • Iamyou Uarei You are the MAN.
      Tuesday at 8:57am ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      You are[I AM or 'I'] is limited to physical entity . holding You are[I AM] as self is erreneous. Self is not a man but the self,which is in the form of consciousness pervades in everything and everywhere in all the three states as their formless substance and witness. SELF IS WITHIN THE THREE STATES BUT IT IS WITHOUT THE THREE STATES. Self is within the three states as their formless substance and it is without the three states as their formless witness. Limiting the self to physical entity is cause of ignorance. Ignorance is cause of experiencing the illusory duality[waking] as reality. until one thinks man is self ,he experiences the birth,life,death and world as reality. preliminary inquiry revels the fact that the self is not the body thus self is not the man. until one thinks self is man, he experiences the practical life within the practical world as reality,whereas on the ultimate standpoint - he as man and his body, his ego and his experience of the world are mere mirage created out of consciousness,which is the inner most self or our true identity. Thus all the form and names are nothing but consciousness. thus consciousness alone is real all else is false hood. the consciousness is ultimate truth or Brahman or Buddha's nature or Christ consciousness or God.

      Tuesday at 9:51am ·

    • Iamyou Uarei Mr. Kummar: Slow down a little, smell the roses, this is not a show is scholarly. Allow all of this knowledge get you out of yourself, and when you give it away, give it slowly.
      LOVE YOU for I am YOU.

      Tuesday at 7:06pm ·

    • Pavlos Dolatzoglou on the other way: if it was to much, it was not enough ;o) (i heard once ;o)
      14 hours ago ·

    • Santthosh Kumaar
      Mr Iamyou , thank you for your wisdom. it is very kind of your valuable advise. Scholarly knowledge is not wisdom . Just by saying I AM YOU , the wisdom will not dawn. ---THE ‘I’ OR ‘I AM’ IS CAUSE OF THE INGNORENCE. Thus one has to get ri...See More

      13 hours ago · · 1 person

    • Iamyou Uarei A little hurt, Are you Mr.Kumaar? If you are hurt, I am YOU. If you are not hurt, I am YOU. Whatever and how ever you are I am YOU. But, you do not want "I" to be YOU. Can't do it, Can YOU? You see I am what YOU perceive me to be, and I am what I perceive I to be.
      I perceive I to be YOU.
      I don’t only LOVE YOU , I am YOU.

      10 hours ago ·

    • Iamyou Uarei I am going to send a frieng request to YOU, I will see how that is recieved..
      10 hours ago ·
    • When the self is beyond form, time and space where is feeling to get hurt. The hurt and feeling are reality within the illusion . When one identifies with the 'I' or I AM ,the self is identified with individuality. Individuality is cause of the ignorance. Ignorance is cause of experiencing illusion as reality . Until we identify the self with words we prevail as reality thus we have to mentally grasp the reality without the words to enter the awareness of our formless true identity ,which is beyond form,time and space. I too love you in duality but in reality we are one. Thank you. I admire your humility. take care and have a blissful time in this illusory duality.

Seeker of truth should not become attached to words as being in perfect conformity with meaning, because Truth is not in the letters.



Seeker of truth should not  become attached to words as being in perfect conformity with meaning, because Truth is not in the letters. When a man with his finger-tip points to something, the finger-tip may be mistaken for the thing pointed at; in like manner the ignorant, are unable even to the day of their death to abandon the idea that in the finger-tip of words there is the meaning itself. They cannot realize Ultimate Reality because of their intent clinging to words which were intended to be no more than a pointing finger. Words and their discrimination bind one to the duality or birth, life and death; meaning stands alone and is a guide to non dual freedom. Meaning is attained by much learning, and much learning is attained by becoming conversant with meaning and not with words; therefore, seekers of truth have to avoid the sticklers for particular words."

Consciousness without division is Ultimate Reality defies all description or characterization." "All characterizations of consciousness, in short, are intended in their experiential dimension to aid those who are searching for ultimate truth or reality but have not yet realized it."

"Human language has its source in phenomenal experience; hence, it is limited in its application to states of being that are beyond that experience; logic is grounded in the duality as it relates to the phenomenal order; hence, it is unable to affirm, without at the same time denying, what extends beyond that order." Whatever is expressed is ultimately non-Brahman, is ultimately untrue."

When the practical life within the practical world are part of the illusion ,than the karma theory based on the false self within the false experience is bound to be false hood. The karma theory and individual conduct are nothing to do with self, which is ever formless.  

Panchadashi: - The Atman is the witness-consciousness that experiences the action, the actor, and the world of separate things. It is like a light that illuminates everything in a theatre, revealing the master of ceremonies, the guests, and the dancers with complete impartiality. Even when they all depart, the light shines to reveal their absence.

The karma theory is meant for those who are immersed in worldly life thinking the individual life within the particle world as reality. In path of truth the karma theory becomes a great obstacle in realizing the truth.  

The reincarnation is based on the karma theory. The karma theory is based on the birth, life and death. The birth, life and death are reality only on the base of the false self. Thus whatever based on the false self is bound to be false hood. By accepting karma theory is accepting the falsehood as reality. Thus whatever is based on the birth identity will not yield any truth. If one accepts the karma theory then it is impossible to treat the world as illusion. All the pundits’ explanation of karma theory carries no weight on realm of truth from the ultimate standpoint.

When the self is not form but the self is formless soul, how the karma will affect the birthless self.

That Karma which is done in a previous life which produces the present life is mere religious theory.  ‘Ego’ [I] is not the self, and the true self is birthless entity, because it is formless. Karma theory has no value in the realm of truth, because self has no birth. The one which is born, lives and dies is the false entity within the false experience.

Essence of scriptuers: - Dehum- Nahum-Kohum –Sohum – which indicates the body is not the self – the self is that. Which clearly indicates the self is without the body. Therefore, the self is the formless knower of the body and the world. Without the body and the world, the self is free from birth life and death.  Therefore, karma theory, which is based on the idea of birth, life, death and rebirth are part of the illusion from ultimate standpoint. Thus one has to learn to view and judge the worldview from ultimate standpoint to know what is truth and what is not truth.     

When the self is neither the body nor the ego, neither the waking entity not the dream entity, then how the karma based on the false self within the false experience can yield fruits.  Therefore, karma is a religious fable. 

The karma theory is reality only for those who believe their present physical identity (ego) as real, and world as reality. When the Sri, Sankara declares the world itself is illusion, and Brahman is real, then what value the karma theory has when the world is illusion, because man is part and parcel of the illusory world. Therefore, one has to view and judge the worldview on the standpoint of Brahman (Atman or soul)in order to overcome the duality, which he is experiencing it as reality.  The individuality is reality within the illusory world. Therefore, all the theories created within the illusion on the base of false entity, within the false experience, has to be the part and parcel of the illusion.  Thus it is necessary to realize the fact that Atman is the true self and all else is illusion, to overcome the illusory concept of cycle of birth, life and death.  Thus to understand and assimilate Sri, Sankara’s Advaitic truth, seeker  has to  do his own home work through inquiry, analysis and reasoning on the true base, without mixing religion, scriptures, theories  concept of god and yoga. 

That is why Sri Sankara says in Aparokshanubhuti:-


   88. When the whole universe, movable and immovable, is known to be Atman, and thus the existence of everything else is negated, where is then any room to say that the body is Atman?

   89. O enlightened one, pass your time always contemplating on Atman while you are experiencing all the results of Prarabdha; for it ill becomes you to feel distressed.

   90. The theory one hears of from the scripture, that Prarabdha does not lose its hold upon one even after the origination of the knowledge of Atman, is now being refuted.

   91. After the origination of the knowledge of Reality, Prarabdha verily ceases to exist, inasmuch as the body and the like become non-existent; just as a dream does not exist on waking.

   92. That Karma which is done in a previous life is known as Prarabdha (which produces the present life). But such Karma cannot take the place of Prarabdha (for a man of knowledge), as he has no other birth (being free from ego).

   93. Just as the body in a dream is superimposed (and therefore illusory), so is also this body. How could there be any birth of the superimposed (body), and in the absence of birth (of the body) where is the room for that (i.e., Prarabdha) at all?

   94. The Vedanta texts declare ignorance to be verily the material (cause) of the phenomenal world just as earth is of a jar. That (ignorance) being destroyed, where can the universe subsist?

   95. Just as a person out of confusion perceives only the snake leaving aside the rope, so does an ignorant person see only the phenomenal world without knowing the reality?


   96. The real nature of the rope being known, the appearance of the snake no longer persists; so the substratum being known, the phenomenal world disappears completely.

   97. The body also being within the phenomenal world (and therefore unreal), how could Prarabdha exist? It is, therefore, for the understanding of the ignorant alone that the Shruti speaks of Prarabdha.

   98. “And all the actions of a man perish when he realizes that (Atman) which is both the higher and the lower”. Here the clear use of the plural by the Shruti is to negate Prarabdha as well.

   99. If the ignorant still arbitrarily maintain this, they will not only involve themselves into two absurdities but will also run the risk of forgoing the Vedantic conclusion. So one should accept those Shruti alone from which proceeds true knowledge.

The above proves that the karma is reality only on the base of false self, where one thinks body and the universes as reality. When one becomes aware of the fact that, the true self is formless soul, then the karma becomes part and parcel of illusion.   My point is that, if one accepts the karma theory as reality, he will never be able to come out of the ignorance. And ignorance makes him believe the cycle of birth, life and death as reality.  Thus the freedom which one is seeking will remain distant dream. For the one who accepts the birth life and death as reality, Self-knowledge is impossible.

Uttara mImamsa, also called Vedanta, does not consider the Upanishads and Brahmanas as arthavada subservient to vidhis. Instead, they are seen to be sources of Brahman knowledge, addressed solely to those who seek moksha or freedom. The rituals enjoined in the Vedas are applicable to the realm of dharma, but the one who seeks liberation does not merely desire a place in heaven; he is in search of ultimate Reality itself. The Upanishads are viewed as those portions of the Sruti that address philosophical questions about Reality, here called Brahman. This tradition of exegesis follows the brahma sutras of badarayana. Within Vedanta, there is considerable difference of opinion on whether the Upanishads enjoin anything at all.

According to Advaita Vedanta, the Veda addresses itself to two kinds of audiences - the ordinary ones who desire the transitory heaven and other pleasures obtained as a result of ritual sacrifices, and the more advanced seeker who seeks to know Brahman. Thus, the purva mimam.sa, with its emphasis on the karma kanda of the Vedas, is meant for the first audience, to help lead its followers along the way. However, the Vedanta, with its emphasis on the jnana kanda, is meant for those who wish to go beyond such transient pleasures. 

An essential identity between Atman and Brahman is upheld in Advaita Vedanta. The personality of Sri, Sankaraand the force of Advaita teaching is so strong that most post-Sankaran schools of Vedanta consciously define their doctrines against Advaita thought.

When Advaita declares Atman and Brahman then direct realization of truth is possible without the scriptures.  Know the soul to be the true self. And true self is in the form of consciousness and realize consciousness as ultimate truth or Brahman.  
Self-Knowledge is the aim of every human being. Since everyone thinks the physical body is the self their aim is misdirected and they focus their attention on materiality which makes one feel the duality [waking] as reality.
Therefore there is no need to study scriptures, or indulge in god and guru glorification or performing religious rituals.  Since, they are not the means to acquire non-dual wisdom. It is only waste of time and effort to indulge in those things. 

The individual self is not real, is not accepted by many.  The non-dual wisdom is based not on the individual self [ego].  Until people hold the ‘I’ [ego] as witness, they will not reach the ultimate understanding.  

When Upanishad itself declares:-   sarvam khalvidam brahma - all this (universe) is verily Brahman. By following back all of the relative appearances in the world, we eventually return to that from which it is all manifest – the non-dual reality [ Chandogya Upanishad].  

Then it is no use going roundabout way, trace the Brahman which is the formless substance and witness of the universe, which is in the form of mind.  By tracing the source of the mind or universe one will be able to realize the Brahman. 

 The true Self is not perceptible to the senses. It is perceived by Reason. It is not perceptible as a thing with form and attributes. To those whose attention is fixed on the body and the world, it is very difficult to attain Self-knowledge. It is also very difficult for them to see the consciousness as self. The attention towards the universe [mind] should be lessened by realizing the self is not the body. The attention has to be focused on the formless substance and witness of the universe [mind] should be increased. So long as the attention is directed towards the universe, the experience of birth, life and death will prevail as reality. But when the attention is directed towards the formless witness, the ignorance vanishes and sense of duality will disappear. Then there is unity in diversity. 

What is the state of the ego or physical self when it has realized that the self is not the body? Such souls have attained their pristine condition. “Self” is not visible to the physical eyes. “Self” is not to be found in the world as a thing, entity or an object. Self is above these, has neither beginning nor ending.

 A visible object has a beginning and an ending. Since Atman, which is in the form of consciousness is invisible to the physical eye; Atman or consciousness is without beginning and ending. Atman is always constant. Just as space is homogeneous everywhere, so is the Atman the same everywhere. 

But he who is truly wise Always sees the absolute Self. Celebrated, he is not delighted. Spurned, he is not angry. Pure of heart, He watches his own actions As if they were another's. How can praise or blame disturb him?
- Ashtavakra Gita 3:9-10

They live in freedom who have gone beyond the dualities of life. Competing with no one, they are alike in success and failure and content with whatever comes to them. They are free, without selfish attachments; their minds are fixed in knowledge. They perform all work in the spirit of service, and their karma is dissolved.
- Bhagavad Gita 4:22-23

An intense desire for truth -realization is itself the way to it. The Lord is The Self in Advaita. Therefore   one need not accept anything other than the self, which is consciousness. Thus consciousness alone is ultimate truth or Brahman that is free from falsehood.


Advita[non-duality]  and dwith[duality]  is  state of  the self. It is not some intellectual theory. Religious based Advitins believe the Ataman [soul] is Brahman; and the world is illusion. Religious dwitins believes the body as self, and they believe world is reality, and they believe in creator and creation theory.   In India Adivita and Dwaith is mere a religious tradition, which they inherited from their ancestors. No one questions their validity, because it is considered blasphemy to question any guru and god-men or pundiths.

 People who are attached to their religious  code of conduct and trying to preach Advaita , that is mixing the individual life, and concept of god, and all mixed up hotchpotch  religious doctrine and feed the seeking minds, are themselves not aware of the fact that,  the individuality,  and the worldly life is part of the illusion.

Buddha must have verified religion, Vedas and concept of god and found them inadequate and useless in pursuit of truth and rejected them and he got enlightened without the aid of religion, Vedas and concept of god.  

 After studying and going through all the rigorous training from the religious scholars in Theosophical Society, J.K was confused about all these, and when he started verifying with deeper introspection, he found everything was priest-crafted hotchpotch ideologies. Thus, he refused to become the world guru, rejected it, and walked out and condemned the priest craft.   

In Advith they accept karma theory.  If they accept the karma theory, one will not be able to reach the nondual destination. If one accepts karma theory then it is impossible to treat the world as illusion. All the pundits’ explanation of karma theory carries no weight on realm of truth because if karma is accepted they are accepting the false self [ego or body] as true self and false experience [universe or waking] as reality. 

The birth, life and death are part of the waking experience, which is mere illusion on the standpoint of the true self.  It is no use of saying that, we are not born, we do not die because, because we all were born and we all are going to die. However, the birth, life and death are part of the illusion, which comes and goes as waking experience.  The formless witness of the three states is real, which is our identity has no birth and death. That is why self-knowledge is nothing to do with the religious based Advith, which is based on Vedas.  

  A Gnani will never say we are not born; we are not going to die.   Only to the mediocre who nod their head, he will say this to inspire them to think of the formless true identity, which is birth less, deathless.   Thus, it is wrong to say we are not born and we do not die by limiting the self to the physical entity.  If one limits the self to the physical entity alone, one gets only half-truth.  The consciousness, which is the true self, pervades all the three states, as their formless substance and witness.  The formless substance and witness, which is our true self [true identity]. Without knowing the true self-mere saying, we are not born, we do not die is not the knowledge, which has come from depth, it is mere bookish knowledge.

 When Sri,Sankara says: world is unreal . He never said body is unreal. He would have said only birth and death is unreal but he did not say that, he said the world is unreal.   He meant   the world including the body, because the body and world appear together and disappear together [waking/dream].  Then we have to think, what remain without the body and the world as reality. How can the birth, life, death, rebirth, and reincarnation, which take place in unreal world [waking/dream], can be true.   The one, which is aware of the birth, life death, rebirth and reincarnation [illusion/unreal], is formless reality, which is the true self/true identity.  The formless self is your true identity, which is birthless and deathless but it is the witness of the birth, life and death and rebirth [illusion/unreal].

 On the standpoint of identity the birth, life, death, rebirth and reincarnation theory is part of the illusion/unreal.  The body cannot reincarnate, the body and the world are created out of the same formless stuff. Until one views and judges on the base of flesh, bone and blood [five elements], he will not be able to grasp the non-dual truth.  Thus, one must know on what standpoint we are not born and we do not die thoroughly, just by hearsay views, it will not lead anyone to the nondual destination. 

Seeker has to learn to view and judge on the standpoint of formless witness [ FW]/soul/self. Then he will be never having any confusion.  When one thinks deeply then only the inner revelation starts and start burning the dross [confusion/doubts]. One has enough material stored in one’s subconscious by reading the Formless Path  blogs; all will start yielding fruits and start revealing, when he starts thinking very deeply.  This is the inner process every serious seeker experiences.  The inner dialogue will start and one will start getting answers from inner core of his existence.