Monday, September 12, 2011

Comparing Vedas with Koran or Bible or any other scriptures will not yield the truth,which is beyond form,time and space.



There are many schools of thought in Hindu religion based on Vedas. These schools of thoughts are add-ons. Therefore, these add-ons have to be bifurcated from original Vedic Religion, to get the pure Vedic essence.  



Sri, Sankara said: The world is unreal and Brahman alone is real.  It means the birth, life and death, which happens within the world, has to be unreal.  If birth, life and death are unreal, then the rebirth and reincarnation and Avataric concept has to be unreal. Thus, it is for the seeker to find out, on what standpoint the world becomes unreal, to know the Brahman, which is ultimate truth. 


Causality taught in the Upanishads is only to enable us to understand the supreme truth of no-origination. The world is not different from the self and the self is not different from Atman and Atman is not different from Brahman. That the non-dual absolute appears as the diverse world is only an illusion. If it really became diverse then the immortal would become mortal.

 The dualist who seek to prove the origination of the unborn, by that very enterprise try to make the immortal, mortal. Ultimate nature can never change - the immortal can never become mortal and vice versa. Gaudapada quotes from the Upanishads: "There's no plurality here"; "The Soul through its powers appears to be many"; "those who are attached to creation or production or origination go to utter darkness"; "the unborn is never reborn, for what can produce it?".

Comparing Vedas with Koran or Bible  or any other scriptures will not yield the  truth,which is  beyond form,time and space. 
Katha Upanishad :- This Atman cannot be attained by the study of the Vedas, or by intelligence, or by much hearing of sacred books. It is attained by him alone whom It chooses. To such a one Atman reveals Its own form. [Katha Upanishad Ch-II -23-P-20]

This Atman cannot be attained through study of the Vedas, nor through intelligence, nor through much learning. He who chooses Atman—by him alone is Atman attained. It is Atman that reveals to the seeker Its true nature. [    3 –page-70 Mundaka Upanishad  Upanishads by Nikilanada]
The above passages further prove that: self-knowledge cannot be attained by study of the Vedas and intellectual understanding or by bookish knowledge.  Therefore, the Vedas and other scriptures are not the means to acquire the non-dual wisdom.  That is why Buddha rejected the scriptures, and even Sri, Sankara indicated that, the truth lies beyond religion, concept of god and scriptures.  

When Upanishads  declare that:- This Atman cannot be attained by the study of the Vedas, or by intelligence, or by much hearing of sacred books then why  to compare Vedas with Bible or Koran or any other religious scriptures to realize the ultimate truth ,which is beyond form,time and space. 


The religion was introduce in the past  for the benefit of the mass mindset  who are incapable to grasp the ultimate  truth.  thus religion is noting to do with pursuit of truth.  because the truth is not belief and religion is based on the belief. 

In theology everyone is entitled to his own view, i.e. what he likes; but in pursuit of truth this is not permissible.  That which dupes most of people is taking satisfaction for truth.  Seeker has to be aware of that which satisfies his   feelings.   "Felt" experience is no guide to the highest, because one’s feeling may differ from others.  

Truth must be independent of one’s self; it is not to be what pleases him: all prejudices must go. Those who talk of "I feel so and so" provide psychological and not spiritualistic reasons.  Devotees seek to know God, because they seek some benefit; seeker of truth seeks to know him in truth.  Steadiness of mind depends upon what one is interested in. one’s mind can be steady only on what his mind is attached to.  

Things and problems concerning truth appear simple at first, and hence ordinary people speak presumptuously and glibly about it. But when one inquire he  find how little he  know and that they are extraordinarily complex and he is  obliged to go deeper and deeper into them.

One   readily takes it for granted that both he and others knows what objects are or what the universe is because he has such immense conceit. Such an easy attitude arises because he does not know the complexity of these apparently simple matters, which in turn arises because of lack of inquiry and reasoning on the true base. 

A person with emotion who changes from one path or school of thought to another, he looks for novelties that appear charming to him.