People suffer from the syndrome known as "identification", here identifying itself with the ego or physical self to such an extent that no reasoning can dislodge it. Even the genius and lunatic suffer from this identification syndrome.
A Gnani is neither believer nor an atheist. He does not say there is no God. He says the
ultimate truth is God. He means the the formless soul, the innermost self is the ultimate truth or Brahman. The soul, the innermost self which knows the negation of all the
three states, is itself not negated.
Most people believe that
following some doctrine, dogma or egotistical self-appointed "agent of
God" makes them religious, when in fact following anything blindly without
verifying the validity of their inherited belief leads to believe their
inherited hallucination as reality.
Not being able to think to
verify the validity of their belief is not a mark of great religious piety, but
a sign of being cut off from knowing the reality of their true existence. No
person blindly following the religious/yogic oriented life prescribed by a
religious doctrine is close to the non-dual truth.
In
fact, not knowing true self represents ignorance. Human experience and the
world exist only in ignorance. Thus religious experiences which are based on
ignorance have no value in the realm of nondual truth.
Till the wisdom dawns one
is caught up in the cycle of birth, life and death. Until soul becomes
"self” the spiritual state of union with soul, one is still an ignorant,
not a complete Gnani.
The whole point of wisdom is to create enlightened, awakened, a Gnanis who take
responsibility for themselves and do not pass it off on any savoir, messiah or
God men.
Religion causes one to
become crippled, self-mortifying and self-deprecating is not a religion but a
social system of controlling the masses through psychological deformation and
retardation
One can think only within
the waking experience. Therefore, even if one stop thinking he still remains
man without the thoughts. The thoughts will not form without form,
feeling perception and mental formation and consciousness. If one of these things are
not thee there no thoughts. The thoughts will not stop until one becomes aware
of the fact that, the self is formless. It is impossible to
get rid of the form without understanding what is mind and what is substance of
the mind.
the formless soul, the innermost self when known
becomes an object. The soul when realized, then it becomes consciousness. This is the
distinction between knowing and realizing.
v Where does the mind go?
It has merges back as consciousness.
There is only one mind.
Physical body, ego and world are mere mirage on the standpoint of soul
, the innermost self or universal mind. This explains how personal
separateness is an illusion. Those who believe they will really die cannot
understand the fundamental distinction between Formless Witness and three
stats. If they did, they would know they could not die.
The soul, the innermost self
pervades all the three states, as its formless substance and witness.
Thus it is impossible for the witness Self to become a physical
self alone. The soul, the innermost self is immortal not the physical body and the
world, because the body and the world are part of the mirage. The formless
substance and witness of the three states is immortal . The waking experience
which contains man and the world is as unreal as the dream.
No one can
ever see the formless witness of the three states
changing. The seen(three states) is ever changing, but not the Formless
Witness. Birth, death, knower are idea characteristic of the Seen (Waking or dream)
only. Where is the proof that the knower is subject to them? Should the pseudo-proof
exist then the Formless Witness becomes only an object of thought, and is thus
no more the formless witness. It never sees the birth or death of the knower.
Senility and death it perceive only where there is an object. The Atman ’s
senility or death is never seen. Thus Ataman is immortal.
The second point to be
learnt in subject(Formless Witness) and object (Three states) Analysis is one becomes
aware of the fact that, the self is neither the waking entity nor the self is dream entity but the self is formless soul,which witnesses the coming and going of the three states.
Deeper
self-search reveals the fact that the, self is neither the waking entity nor
the self is the dream entity but the self is formless soul, which witnesses the
coming and going of the three states in succession without the physical
apparatus. This has to be mentally
grasped and assimilated to realize the formless soul, the innermost self is nothing to do with the three states.
On the standpoint of the three states, the three states are mere illusion.
it is erroneous
to view and judge and conclude the truth on the base of the ego or waking entity,
which is the false self within the false experience.
If one has to understand
the soul, the innermost self than he must first understand Mind,which is present in the form of universe. Religionists mistake mind as
being separate from the soul This is only true in preliminary of inquiry. In
pursuit of truth one knows and begin with only two things--mind and
substance of the mind. When he reaches the stage of unity of things, then the
substance of the mind (consciousness) becomes the Self and there is no second thing exist other than consciousness.
Religionists distinction
between mind and matter is incorrect. Gnani further goes and says
mind itself is matter, and matter/mind is an object to the formless self. and he
separates the knower or the seer from mind(three states) which is an object.
Formless Witness and three states are ultimately consciousness, because they are one in
essence.
One has never seen the
birth of the Formless Witness, (soul or consciousness) as it sees the birth of the three
states, so it is not possible to say that it is mortal, it is birth less and
deathless. There is no such thing as knowing the knower.
That knowledge implies two factors, and the knower not being
something to be seen, can never be known as such. When one speaks of
relation, he deals only with the known Waking or dream. When the known goes,
one says that because he actually see the known going; but he can never see the
knower go. He can only say, "he do not know" about it.