Psychologists regard consciousness as something, which appears and disappears, as relational to something. Gnanis position is the exact opposite, for he regards it as that which does not vanish, that which sees all the three states. Therefore he does not regard it as self-consciousness (in Religionists sense) -- that is entirely different. Hence, the term soul, when meant for pure consciousness is not self on the personal limited Religionists sense.
Those who cannot understand Witness and witnessed Analysis cannot grasp non dualistic nor Advaitic truth.
Religious believers psychologists, they combine witness with witnessed and all the
combinations as "consciousness." Gnani separates them and call
Formless Witness only as "Consciousness" (the soul, the innermost self).
It is not settled by psychologists
what the mind is. They often do not define what it is because they find it so
difficult. It is impossible to know what the mind is, because the more they
think about it get only thoughts: they cannot ordinarily detach themselves from
them, the three states, and be the Witness (the soul, the innermost self). They can go on thinking
about mind for a century but all that will come will be more thoughts.
Gnani does not rule out
multiplicity of individuals and things; he admits this separate existence,
since it cannot be denied. However, he asks, "What is meant by each
existence? What has become of the vanished or changed individuality of each
existence? What has become of the child I once was?" When it is
superficial and fond of imagining, it can say what it like, but when it go deeper
in the inquiry, it sees that multiplicity of the world(duality) is not what it seems.
When one thinks of his body
as an infant, what is that to him now? When he thinks of it again as a youth, what has happened to it now? When he thinks finally of the body at middle age,where is it now? He will see that
he had so many different bodies. None
can be identified as particularly and permanently his.
It is difficult to grasp at
the beginning ,How did ignorance come into pure Atman ?it is due to ignorance.
This ignorance is born of considering false self as the real self. It
causes in the person the contrary of truth and he views and judges the world
view on the base of false self. It is the incapacity, the dullness, of the mind
to understand it. However, when the mind gets clear, then he "sees"
the Truth. Hence, the inability to see is not in the perceiver, but the
mind('I') which comes and goes, which hides and prevents one from "seeing." This "mind('I' )" is like a veil.
It is the illusory reality
which prevents one to believe the duality as reality. mind is the only thing which is available for
the seeker , because the whole experience of diversity is nothing but mind. The mind is something that
comes and goes, but the formless
witness is untouched by it. Religion
does not want truth because it is based on the false self within the false
experience.
People who believe their
physical self as reality makes the 'ego' the center of everything by reducing everything and everyone to mere idea or notions.
Religious believers find itself in danger of falling into this egocentric predicament.
Therefore, they avoid it by saying that God creates other minds, persons who
really exist in a different way from material objects, which are merely
perceived.