There is no evidence is
there for the creation and creator theory is a religious fable
because nobody as seen creator creating the creation. Mere belief cannot be
taken as truth. Therefore, it is
necessary investigate the source for all existing things [universe]
in order to the mystery behind physical existence.
It is impossible to believe in the theories without
verification. One has to get himself
satisfied and establish by discovering what the ultimate truth is. All
religious and scriptural claims are not the yardstick to know what is truth and
what is not truth.
Even granting that there
was such a thing as religious propagated god, heaven and hell they are highly
implausible assertions with absolutely no supporting evidence. That many
millions of people have believed these absurd claims provides no evidence that
they are true.
By condemning the religion and its propagated ideas are not the
means of Self-Realization but realizing the fact that, the “self’” is not
individual but it pervades in everything and everywhere in all the three
states. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the three states to realize the fact that, the “self” is neither the
waking entity not the dream entity but it is the formless substance and witness
of the three states, which comes and goes in succession.
Thus the religion and its
idea of god, which is based on the waking entity is false hood because the
waking entity itself is false self within the false experience. Therefore, whatever seen, known, believed and
experienced as reality within the waking experience is falsehood. Thus any doctrine which prescribes other than
Self- Realization or Self-Knowledge will lead one towards hallucination.
There is no point in examining the curious details of the
religious fables because they are simply
a statement of faith (as it was intended to be) and there is absolutely no
reason to suppose that it is true (in fact, since it is absurd it is very
likely to be false). One is
asked to blindly believe but no reason is given, or evidence presented, for why
one should believe.
In the case of religious belief the ulterior motive is usually
social control or the financial benefit of some part of an organized religion.
Believing with no evidence to support belief is not a virtue but rather a sign
of ignorance. The belief is based on the false self. The believer himself is the false entity within the false
experience. There is no scope for duality
in reality.
It is true that there are people
whose intellectual abilities are such that we cannot say they are unintelligent
and yet who regard themselves as believers of faith. This is because, although
there may be no reason to believe the religion, there are conditions under
which a person will accept and cling to it. This may be the occurrence of some
emotional "crisis" but mainly results from childhood conditioning, in
which parents with religious beliefs inculcate these beliefs in their innocent
and unsuspecting children, before the minds of those children have developed to
the point where they can intelligently decide about the truth of what they are
being told.
If a person values their upbringing by their parents then they
will be inclined to maintain the faith which they inherited from parental
grooming, unless they are sufficiently intelligent to be able to distinguish
between real and the unreal it becomes impossible to give up the religious
conditioning that was given to them before they had developed the mental
ability whereby to accept or reject those beliefs.
