The
'Void' of emptiness of Buddhism is only a stage. It cannot be ultimate. It says
there is really nothing. The mistake of Hinayana Buddhism is to jump to
assumptions where Buddha kept silent.
Everything
is made of the same substance, whether it be inside--as in dreams--or outside
as in waking. Whatever is seen as object, heard as sound or name is of the same
substance. Many have begun to suspect this truth. This is the great
lesson to be learnt. Consciousness is all this."
Reason
should not be interpreted to mean intellect. Soul-centric Reason is that which finally
distinguishes between real and unreal, false and true, and therefore it takes
all the three states into account.
Until that is attained people generally use
only intellect which is confined to waking state only. Intellect evolves into
Reason as man realizes that study of the waking world is not enough, and that
study of all the phenomena of mind, consciousness is required. Such study must
embrace dream and sleep; hence there is no perfection of reason without analyzing
the three states of consciousness.
Reason
literally means 'that which distinguishes the ultimate reality from the rest.'
When such discrimination between truth and falsehood by the method of reasoning
is confined to the physical plane, it is intellect, logic, but when extended to
the spiritual plane it is reason.
Spiritualistic
reason is not based on ego but the formless soul, which is the innermost self.
Soul-centric Reason is that which enables one to distinguish the real from the
unreal, true from false. The intellectuals do not clearly know the difference
between intellect and reason.
Knowledge
derived from wisdom or Gnana is content less existence, whereas intellectuality
is the ordinary dualistic knowledge. Intellectuals have no idea of the first
definition of it as yet because they are not aware of the existence of the
formless witness of the three states. And they refuse accept anything other
than their accepted truth which are based on the false self [ego] within the
false experience [waking]. "Intellectuality”
is a nothing to do with Brahmic – Gnana or non-dualistic wisdom.
Intellectuality is useful in practical
life within the practical world. And its judgment is based on logical
conclusions based on the ego which is not the self.
Many
intellectuals have a tremendous intellect; most will agree with their theories
based on the ego, which is false self within the false experience. It does mean
possesses Self –knowledge or non-dualistic Gnana? And knowledge based on the
false self within the false experience is limited to false experience [waking]
therefore it is certainly not self-knowledge.
Gnana
is usually translated as "knowledge" but that is because there is no
equivalent word in English. It is more accurately "content less
consciousness" or “self-awareness”.
Most think Consciousness usually implies something,
thoughts or things, but it is the formless non-dual nature of the Atman or the
soul.
The
consciousness exists with or without the matter because without the
consciousness the matter ceases to exist because the matter is created out of
consciousness. . It exists as matter in
waking or dream. And when wisdom dawns it is consciously aware
of its formless non-dual true nature in the midst of matter, as in deep sleep.